
Shown is a new map of congressional districts provided by the Supreme Court Of Pennsylvania on Wednesday, Feb. 23, 2022. Pennsylvania's highest court is breaking a partisan deadlock over a new map of congressional districts by selecting boundaries that broadly adhere to the current outlines of the state's districts. (Supreme Court Of Pennsylvania via AP)
The case dragged on for weeks, as Republicans challenged the new 17-district map picked by the state Supreme Court.
HARRISBURG — The remnants of a federal lawsuit by Republicans challenging Pennsylvania’s new congressional districts were dropped Tuesday, three weeks after the US Supreme Court declined to intervene and stop the plan.
The case remained alive after the justices declined to prevent the 17-district map approved by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court from being used in this year’s elections.
But last week a three-person panel of federal judges in Pennsylvania pared the case back, leaving only a question about whether population variations of one or two residents out of hundreds of thousands met federal standards.
The plaintiffs’ lawyers filed a one-sentence motion of voluntary dismissal of what remained of the case.
Wally Zimolong, their lawyer, noted that courts have not ruled on the underlying merits of the arguments he made.
“I 100% believe that the claims were meritorious when I filed them. I believe they’re meritorious now,” Zimolong said. “Unfortunately, a three-judge panel disagreed on whether our clients have standing to raise those claims. The claims were not adjudicated as being unmeritorious.”
The group that sued was denied a request for a temporary restraining order by US District Judge Jennifer P. Wilson in February, then asked the US Supreme Court to reconsider that request.
When the US Supreme Court turned it down, the underlying lawsuit went back to Wilson, who with two other judges ruled the plaintiffs lacked legal standing on the critical issues — whether the new congressional districts violate federal election law and if the state Supreme Court overstepped its authority by making changes to the election calendar.
The plaintiffs included two Republicans running for Congress this year and a member of the elections board in Susquehanna County.
They argued the new set of maps favors Democrats, including by putting Republican US Reps. Glenn Thompson and Fred Keller into the same central Pennsylvania district.
The Pennsylvania justices picked a new set of district lines after a plan that had been passed by GOP majorities in the Legislature was vetoed by Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf.
The defendants were Wolf, Acting Secretary of State Leigh Chapman, and Jessica Mathis, Wolf’s director of the Bureau of Election Services and Notaries. A Department of State spokeswoman declined comment.

For Rep. Susan Wild, supporting PA families includes reproductive rights and much more
Rep. Susan Wild wants to be very clear with Pennsylvanians: Donald Trump is committed to taking away women’s reproductive freedom, but he is not...

School districts working with anti-LGBTQ groups can cost your kids’ schools millions
Parents across South Central Pennsylvania are worried about the potential financial impacts working with anti-LGBTQ groups may have on their school...

VIDEO: Trump distances himself from his anti-abortion views
Donald Trump appeared on WGAL on Tuesday and continued to distance himself from his anti-abortion views claiming that reproductive rights are now a...

VIDEO: Community pushback gets school board to rescind decision on denying gay actor’s visit
Cumberland Valley School Board offered a public apology and voted to reinstate Maulik Pancholy as a guest speaker a week after the board voted to...

VIDEO: Project 2025 brings nuclear armageddon back into vogue
Project 2025 is a titanic document, with plans ranging from cutting half of all government employees to targeting reproductive rights on a scale...