In this Nov. 7, 2020 file photo, Pennsylvania state Sen. Doug Mastriano, R-Franklin, speaks to supporters of President Donald Trump as they demonstrate outside the Pennsylvania State Capitol, in Harrisburg, Pa., after Democrat Joe Biden defeated Trump to become 46th president of the United States. Mastriano, a rising force in Pennsylvania's ultra-conservative circles who has talked of his desire to bring an Arizona-style audit to Pennsylvania, led a private briefing Wednesday, June 30, 2021, for Republican senators on his plan. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez, File) Election 2020-Pennsylvania Audit
In this Nov. 7, 2020 file photo, Pennsylvania state Sen. Doug Mastriano, R-Franklin, speaks to supporters of President Donald Trump as they demonstrate outside the Pennsylvania State Capitol, in Harrisburg, Pa., after Democrat Joe Biden defeated Trump to become 46th president of the United States. Mastriano, a rising force in Pennsylvania's ultra-conservative circles who has talked of his desire to bring an Arizona-style audit to Pennsylvania, led a private briefing Wednesday, June 30, 2021, for Republican senators on his plan. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez, File)

Tioga County has already rebuffed Mastriano’s efforts. Philadelphia has yet to respond.

HARRISBURG — Another Pennsylvania county targeted for an Arizona-style “forensic investigation” of the 2020 presidential election being pushed by former President Donald Trump is raising strong objections to a sweeping demand for access to its voting equipment and records.

York County’s three commissioners—two Republican and one Democrat—wrote this week to the Republican state lawmaker seeking the information and raised questions about the legality of his demand, the cost to the county and their lack of staff to complete the project.

The commissioners also pointed to the likelihood that its voting machines would be decertified and rendered useless if they allow third-party access to the machines that is not authorized by the state or the company that supplied them, Dominion Voting Systems.

In any case, the county’s commissioners said they had run the election legally, securely and transparently, and completed the required county and state audits confirming the accuracy of the results.

York County responded a week after receiving the five-page request from Republican state Sen. Doug Mastriano, who has talked of possibly running for governor and claimed that Trump “asked me” to run.

Mastriano did not immediately respond Thursday to messages.

Trump has persistently falsely claimed the 2020 election was rigged against him, and pressured Republican lawmakers in Pennsylvania and other states he lost narrowly to conduct an audit, as is happening in Arizona.

Mastriano (R-Franklin) issued his request letters to Philadelphia, Tioga, and York counties last week, with the threat of subpoenas for holdouts who do not respond affirmatively by July’s end.

However, Gov. Tom Wolf and state Attorney General Josh Shapiro, both Democrats, have suggested that they will challenge any subpoena in court.

It’s not clear whether a court would block or enforce a subpoena. It’s also not clear whether Mastriano will have the backing of Senate Republican leadership in a legal showdown.

Mastriano, who has helped spread Trump’s baseless falsehoods that the election was rigged, ran bus trips to the Jan. 6 rally that became an attack on the Capitol. Mastriano has not been connected to events inside the capital.

Democrats accuse Mastriano of orchestrating a “sham audit,” saying he is seeking to undermine the legitimacy of President Joe Biden’s victory in a bid for Trump’s endorsement to run for governor.

Commissioners in rural Republican-controlled Tioga County expressed similar concerns this week, worrying that handing over their voting machines could mean a $1 million tab to replace them just weeks before they need to prepare them for the fall election.

Philadelphia, the state’s largest city and where four out of five voters are Democrats, has not responded to Mastriano.

In light of Mastriano’s requests, Wolf’s administration warned counties not to provide access for third parties to copy or examine state-certified electronic voting systems and election management systems or components.

The massive undertaking envisioned by Mastriano could cost millions of dollars and faces questions, such as who will do the work, how will it be funded and where such a vast amount of documents and equipment would be stored.

In their four-page letter, York County’s commissioners said “we could more properly consider such request” if Mastriano were to answer their questions.

They suggest that Mastriano—acting through the Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee, which he chairs—lacks the legal jurisdiction to delve into election oversight.

The county’s agreement with Dominion only permits the kind of review sought by Mastriano to “occur by a court order or ‘agency with appropriate jurisdiction,’” they wrote.

Among their questions are who Mastriano envisions giving access to York County’s election equipment, bought at a cost of $2.7 million, they said.

The county wants a “written agreement and plan which addresses all of our security concerns and contractual responsibilities” and will require any group analyzing the machines to be approved by the state and the vendor, the commissioners wrote.

They also questioned whether the state or Senate will supply the staff, oversight, and money necessary to carry out the huge demand on the county to respond to Mastriano’s request.

“If not, the York County commissioners cannot in good conscience agree that the York County taxpayers should foot the bill for this forensic investigation,” they wrote.