Up to 133 million Americans have pre-existing conditions covered by the Affordable Care Act. If the Supreme Court overturns the law, the consequences could be disastrous.
When Ruth Bader Ginsburg died last month, it sent shockwaves across the United States, raising fears about what a 6-3 conservative-leaning Supreme Court would mean for everything from civil rights to environmental rules to women’s reproductive rights.
Among those who are most terrified of the potential confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the court are some of the up to 133 million Americans who live with pre-existing medical conditions such as diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. Before the Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010, people with pre-existing conditions were often denied coverage, offered minimal coverage, or forced to pay for extremely expensive plans.
“If you had a pre-existing condition before the ACA, depending on where you lived and whom your carrier was, you could be denied coverage or be deemed uninsurable,” Howard Koh, former assistant secretary for health for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under President Barack Obama told COURIER last month. “And given the burden of chronic disease in our country, that involved millions of people.”
The ACA was a game-changer, however. The 2010 healthcare law made it illegal for health insurance companies to deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions or charge them higher rates for coverage.
It is not an exaggeration to say the ACA saved people’s lives. Just ask Paul Gibbs, a father of two from West Valley City, Utah, who has kidney issues that require constant care and previously described the law as a “gift from God.”
That gift could soon be taken away. The Supreme Court is set to hear a case on Nov. 10—one week after Election Day—in which 18 Republican-led states, with the backing of President Donald Trump, are suing to repeal the ACA.
If the court sides with Republicans and strikes down the law, not only would an estimated 21 million Americans lose their insurance, but tens of millions of people like Paul would lose protections for pre-existing conditions and could once again be denied coverage.
Paul’s life quite literally hangs in the balance. So do those of countless other Americans. In the aftermath of Ginsburg’s death, we reached out to Paul and two other Americans who rely on the ACA to keep them and their loved ones healthy. We asked them to share their feelings and fears about what would happen if the ACA were repealed.
Here’s what they had to say:
For Rep. Susan Wild, supporting PA families includes reproductive rights and much more
Rep. Susan Wild wants to be very clear with Pennsylvanians: Donald Trump is committed to taking away women’s reproductive freedom, but he is not...
School districts working with anti-LGBTQ groups can cost your kids’ schools millions
Parents across South Central Pennsylvania are worried about the potential financial impacts working with anti-LGBTQ groups may have on their school...
VIDEO: Trump distances himself from his anti-abortion views
Donald Trump appeared on WGAL on Tuesday and continued to distance himself from his anti-abortion views claiming that reproductive rights are now a...
VIDEO: Community pushback gets school board to rescind decision on denying gay actor’s visit
Cumberland Valley School Board offered a public apology and voted to reinstate Maulik Pancholy as a guest speaker a week after the board voted to...
VIDEO: Project 2025 brings nuclear armageddon back into vogue
Project 2025 is a titanic document, with plans ranging from cutting half of all government employees to targeting reproductive rights on a scale...